![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
1. I am not sure if the fen on my flist has seen this, however, assuming it is true...
Response to LJer re teh bannings Note to LJ: Likely =/= does
2. Contracts cannot be changed online without notice, court rules
3. How did they decide it was minors? After seeing one of the pics...it's hard to say whether or not one of the characters was underage. Yes, it was HP, and one of the characters Harry, but that doesn't mean he was depicted as under 18 in the picture.
In other porn related news, the third installment of The Dark Side of Porn should be up by tonight.
Response to LJer re teh bannings Note to LJ: Likely =/= does
2. Contracts cannot be changed online without notice, court rules
3. How did they decide it was minors? After seeing one of the pics...it's hard to say whether or not one of the characters was underage. Yes, it was HP, and one of the characters Harry, but that doesn't mean he was depicted as under 18 in the picture.
In other porn related news, the third installment of The Dark Side of Porn should be up by tonight.
